Wednesday, March 17, 2010
I don't understand
The current board agrees that the golf club is correct in its interpretation of the original covenant. Do you and your running mates agree with this? If so what is the plan to get the golf course patch access back, is it to find private property owners that actually own part of the path and then use them to threaten the golf course into cutting a deal? Have you actually identified a single property owner who claims to own part of the path and who is willing to participate in this plan?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Well, there is a difference of opinion about what the offering plan says but that could be argued forever.
The bike path encroaches on homeowner's property in about thirty places for over 4000 feet. That is according to surveys obtained from the Town of Amherst and homeowners. The golf course repeatedly refuses to indicate anything to the contrary.
And yes, a number of bike path owners want to push the issue.
Post a Comment